Want Some Answers ???

Hi Tommy,  You wrote,

>>Dear Doctor Coward, Since you're "AFRAID" to open the enclosure I sent you, I posted my rebuttal to your last email at http://www.skepticfriends.org/letter53.html Furthermore, I posted ALL your correspondence to SFN, verbatim, instead of just my "reply" to your email. Unlike you, I'm not afraid to let others witness firsthand your lies, distortions, and misrepresentations<<

I've mentioned 3 times I don't open attachments. Because some write with strong and angry emotional views when challenged (like you). The fact you call me "Doctor Coward" proves that. I don't open attachments, nothing personal, just common sense. And as you know, I also don't publish 'four letter words'.  Post your 'rebuttal' to me  if you want my attention or people will think you are a "coward" (text only).

I quote chapter & verse - anyone can check my website to judge who is 'lying'. But I know one thing, evolution lies to you. Its amazing, Sceptics are supposed to be thinkers, readers and searchers of truth and they yet don't CARE for the truth. I publish all "your email" so others can follow "firsthand" the discussion and judge for themselves regarding "distortions". Parts of your last letter were distortions. You are the one 'misrepresenting' the Bible, and scientists particularly those who are creationists. For example, Dr. Morris and Dr Gish. You wrote,

>>You did, in fact, have a good reason to "fear" opening my enclosure, but not for the reasons you offered.  After you read my rebuttal, you'll WISH that the only thing you had to fear was a possible virus.<<

My website says "no attachments" see "Introduction Page" - written long before you wrote. Nothing you write makes me 'afraid', but I fear for you Tommy. I don't know how old you are, but I hate to see you treat God's Word with contempt, only to face Him one day. Plato was right 'Atheism is a disease of the soul before it is an error of the mind' [Readings In Natural Theology ed. J.A.Baisnee (Westminster Newland Press) 1964 pg.149].

Yes I know Larry said 'there's no atheists on the SFN staff'. But listen to you guys defend evolution and rubbish the Bible!!!  David didn't even know atheism and evolutionism go together.  You think we have the 'missing links'. Really? One really has a blind faith to believe nothing produced something as marvelous and complex as the brain of man. To argue everything just happened by natural processes, chance and time is denying reality. I believe there's more to life than just a material body, there are things we can't see.

 And the only way for Sceptics to be absolutely sure there's no God is to know everything about everything. You don't and nor do I. In order to prove there's no God Sceptics must become the very God they are seeking to disprove.

When one rejects God's existence they have no reference for a correct understanding of the world or oneself. Sceptics of course have absolutely no intention of accepting anything I tell them simply on principle. They can't admit to one point I make as having truth to it. For once they start that, the whole evolution shambles falls down.  For you people, truth doesn't matter, reason doesn't matter and science, logic or facts must be ignored [if necessary] to maintain the hapless evolution charade.   That's why evolution must be shown in its true light.  Sceptics have no excuse for embracing evolution and rejecting God's existence, because God has given enough visible proofs of His existence. You wrote,

>>I also request that you post a link to my other response to you, instead of just your "reply" to it.<<

You won't be 'requesting' me to jump at your command. If I answer email for others to read, that's my call, not yours.  If you want my answers to your mail, follow the rules like everyone else. You quoted Pro.18:2 -

>>"A fool finds no pleasure in understanding, but delights in airing his own opinions." (Proverbs 18:2)<<

Interesting, You and Skeptics Friends Network treat the Bible like a joke, mocking those who believe it, but are you seriously applying it to me? The Bible also says, "The fool says in his heart there is no God".  How does that apply to your verse and you? The very fact you find wrong with me proves there is a right [and a God]. The moment you say moral ideas [yours] are better than others, you're measuring them by a standard. One moral idea conforms to the standard better than another.  If no set of moral ideas were better than another, what's the difference between Christian morality and Nazi morality?

The fact there's a right and wrong cannot be instinct. For we can judge between instinct and what should be obeyed. Because there is a moral law (we are creatures with moral capacities) then God must exist as a moral being capable of ensuring justice. A moral idea cannot exist anywhere but in a mind, and absolute moral idea can exist only in a Mind from which all reality is derived.

Our moral experience points to a transcendent God who is the source and ground of our morality. Our moral values reveal something about the nature and purpose of reality or they are subjective and meaningless. And I can't accept that or live by it. My recognition of an objective moral law drives me to the belief in God. Do you take Proverbs seriously? How about Pro.1:7? How about,

"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." [Jn.3:16]

Why take one verse literally and ignore others? Surely John 3:16, has a message? Why not? I am happy to be called "a fool" if Skeptics respond to John 3:16. You claimed to have "accepted Christ" but "been disillusioned" with the "convoluted apologetics". To me, God's is real - Christ is alive, I know Him and walk with Him. No 'Christian hypocrite' can rob me of that. No atheist who calls himself an "agnostic" can deny that.

Why don't you ask God to reveal Himself to you? Ask God, 'Are you there? He will answer! He did for me. Read and enjoy the Bible with the desire to learn the mind of God, it works for me!

Best,
Mark