Want Some Answers ???

You wrote,

>>In Caps, Inject your rebutle into this text  Ie.  Modern Bibles: WHAT IS MEANT BY MODERN  etc. Thanks:  JJ  Your servant<<

The problem I have with this idea JJ is that I take the next five days carefully working through this email book you posted and at the end my questions are still unanswered. Then I post my comments back, its regarded as 'rubbish' of course, and deleted. And I have wasted my time.

 But what say is this, that KJ radicals make one common mistake. They constantly imagine that doctrine is determined by comparing translations. It's NOT! Doctrine is not formulated by comparing translations and its not based on the rendering in one verse. There are a thousand verses that one can quote and prove anything!  eg. KJV Psa 146:3  "Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help." If I did not tell you this came from the KJV Scott Jones would put it in his long list of translation differences. Only a KJ radical could interpret this verse as an attack on Christ and sincerely believe it. The NIV says, "the Son of Man came to seek and to save" so I might regard the KJV as Satanic. There are numerous similar examples that could be given.

However thank you for the paper by Scott Jones [or was it Bob Jones?] I have read it and found interesting but typical. Of course you could have injected your rebuttal into my original email instead of just posting someone else's book.  

Regards

Mark